Our editorial rule is simple: describe what the evidence shows, what it does not show and why the distinction matters.
We cover questions readers encounter in search, social media and consumer marketing. Popularity can explain why we examine a claim; it does not make the claim true.
We prioritise medicine regulators, official product information, clinical guidance, systematic reviews and relevant peer-reviewed human research. Early human studies, animal work and laboratory experiments may be included to explain research context, with their limits stated clearly. Seller pages and testimonials are not treated as proof of effectiveness.
Future Health Guide is an editorial publication and does not imply clinical credentials the team does not hold. Articles are educational and are not a substitute for medical care. If specialist review is added to a page, the reviewer and their relevant credentials will be identified on that page.
Comparison pages state whether products were physically tested. Where a guide is based on desk research, we use public manufacturer or retailer specifications, published evidence and safety considerations, and we label that method. Affiliate commission does not determine inclusion or ranking.
Paid links are identified. We do not accept payment to describe an unapproved medicine as safe, effective or appropriate for personal use. Advertising and affiliate relationships do not give a commercial partner editorial approval.
We update material when important evidence, regulation, safety information or product availability changes. Send correction requests to contact@futurehealthguide.com with a source and the affected URL. Material changes may be reflected in the page’s updated date.